Maybe if people knew about alternatives, they would use CF less. I wouldn't use them at all (and don't; I switch when my hoster cannot handle the attack which happened once only).
Maybe if people knew about alternatives, they would use CF less. I wouldn't use them at all (and don't; I switch when my hoster cannot handle the attack which happened once only).
https://www.techradar.com/news/best-ddos-protection
https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/ddos-mitigation-solut...
https://expertinsights.com/insights/top-distributed-denial-o...
No idea about the content of those links, but considering the amount of research I do before selecting a colo provider, it'd be trivial in comparison to research a DDoS protection service.
So basically the choice is cloudflare if you are not cashed up enough. So nothing to do with lazy; there are no other viable options for most if it's a large attack.
It's like doing research for colo, like my example. If you have the need, then a couple of hours of research is well worthwhile. I don't have the need, so I'm not going to do it now, but that's how one starts.
The colo example is apt - colo providers that don't have pricing are invariably too expensive, so I skip them, but there are plenty of others to check out that aren't Cloudflare. The one article I skimmed even says whether the providers are pricy or affordable.
Nobody needs Cloudflare. If (most) people were aware of how much Cloudflare breaks visibility across the world, they'd likely avoid Cloudflare, too.