The other thing from a jailbreak would be for it to become self hosting, that is, give the ability to make full blown iPhone ipa on an iOS device without needing a macOS device anywhere at all.
The internet tethering limits are in the contract though. Surely the primary goal for jailbreaking isn't just theft of service?
> The other thing from a jailbreak would be for it to become self hosting, that is, give the ability to make full blown iPhone ipa on an iOS device without needing a macOS device anywhere at all.
You can create full-fledged local apps, or publish them for free or sale in the App Store using Playgrounds on an iPad.
The primary limitations are in things like typing speed and screen real estate as well as UX complexity and side-by-side debugging, none of which directly change with an active jailbreak.
I don't recognize that 10 GiB downloaded via my phone, or via my laptop connected to my phone as different, no matter what the contract says.
> on an iPad.
I said iOS not iPadOS, but that's good to know.
When it really truly matters, like when I have a business need to download huge items in remote areas, the $10/GB+ justifies itself.
And video streaming, probably most people's biggest bandwidth use, fits very well on phones.
Does anyone offer a tethering plan that's rate limited but not data limited?
T-Mobile in the US; they give you a set amount of high-speed tethering based on your plan, then it rate limits severely until the end of the billing cycle unless you upgrade your plan or buy a a pack of data.
Though with how happily and loudly they've made 1.5Mbps video excluded from data caps, it would be better if the throttled speed was at least 1.5Mbps.
My problem with this is that it's the wrong measure.
There's no good technical reason to shape traffic to a specific rate irrespective of network conditions or capacity. All of the links in the chain support QoS.
Shaping a bandwidth hog to a tier below the rest of the users makes sense, but that's not what's going on.