Hacker News Reader

I use magit. I still use git absorb. The issue for me is not the speed at which I can run the interactive rebase, it is the amount of looking I have to do to find the correct commit to fixup onto in a big stack of commits. git absorb figures that out for me.

magit supports git-absorb out of the box if its installed; see the magit-commit-absorb command. I find it quite useful.

magit is fantastic but this isn't at all the same thing.

fixup is "stage changes, users selects past commit to fixup, commit staged changes"

absorb is "stage changes, git-absorb figures out which past commit to fixup, commit staged changes"