I don't think there are 1000 different ways to get both a ruler and a laptop that belonged to the same murder victim.
[2] Murderer specifically tries to pin the murder on someone else. Someone else being prosecuted is a good way to live free after, gifts his laptop and a ruler to the suspect or leaves them somewhere where they are discovered and taken.
Is that unlikely? Is it more unlikely than a murderer keeping the laptop and ruler from a victim, tying him to the murder?
For me this alone would be absolutely insufficient evidence, to sentence someone to death. The ease with which some here would do this shocks me.
Juries can get things wrong, but we’re also just getting the cliff notes of the trial rather than the whole story.