I have games that I have given money to access many years ago, and I can still select them in Steam and install them without paying rent again.
Steam is better value for me over more than a couple of months, and so was eMusic until Sony ruined it.
Steam is better value for me over more than a couple of months, and so was eMusic until Sony ruined it.
Is the argument that Steam is worse than Spotify because a subset of games have got built in self destruct, while Spotify only requires ongoing rent to access that 99¢ song?
I think the self destruct is bad, and requiring 3rd party logins for single player games should not be allowed.
The platform itself will remove everything from you unless you keep paying Taylor Swift every month, and the artists you actually listen to probably don't get anything, unless you only listen to top ten charting songs.