You can use objects in C++ and Java without mixing code and data (by having data-only and code-only classes for example).
I haven't fully read it, but there's a book from a clojure developer about about this: https://www.manning.com/books/data-oriented-programming
The book itself uses Java, not Clojure.
Maybe I needed to "git gud", but learning Lisp enabled a career building valuable products currently in production. Java and C# were a roadblock on the way to my current productivity.
I'm happy in my Clojure job and I would rather not work with OO languages, and that's definitely not how they're taught, but if/when you're forced to use them you can choose not to follow the traditional way and instead write them in a more functional/data oriented way.
Almost all of the code examples in the book are in JavaScript (not Java) though a significant feature of Sharvit's approach is that it decouples Data Oriented Programming from any specific language. As a Clojure geek, I highly recommend the book as the way to achieve some of Clojure's core virtues in other languages.
The comment provides an alternative view on things and even links to a nice book. One may not agree with the perspective, but that's no reason to downvote.
Perhaps it's the user interface (a special upvoting wand would be most welcome for those of us whose fingers are too fat). Or have we reached the stage where script kiddies deploy downvoting bots if they didn't like a comment in another thread?