Iran just launched over 400 ballistic missiles at Israel
wsj.com
wsj.com
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2024-10-01/ty-article-li...
I get that the Iranian rockets are somewhat dumb, but even then there were hundreds of them. And Iran still probably ranks quite high on military kit sophistication (at least among the adversaries of the Global West)
There are many videos of missile impacts, so the lack of casualties is not because the missiles were intercepted.
Somehow there are no reports of Israeli casualties (yet).
We'll see how Israel responds, or if they keep their focus on southern Lebanon.
Or are being detected, tracked, and ignored unless they are likely to land somewhere important.
https://old.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/1ftt06t/doze...
https://old.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/1fttep9/mult...
I'm greatly skeptical that nobody else has been killed, and that damage is minimal.
It might be that Iran doesn't want to cause any real damage (as then Israel would destroy its oil industry and nuclear sites in retaliation) — it only wants to save face. For that, a media picture of "hundreds of missiles falling on Israel" would perfectly suffice — they can sell it domestically. Just bomb some bushes and deserts and call it a day.
Having said that, I have no idea if there was some tech transfer from Russia to Iran to enable it.
Cruise missiles are harder to intercept because you don't know where they will hit. They can change course on short notice which ballistic missiles cannot do after burning their fuel.
Note that plain old ballistic missile warheads are quite challenging to intercept. Past operational systems used nuclear warheads on the interceptors.
Cruise missiles have a lower range but can change course. This makes interception more difficult since you don't know for sure where they will hit. The difficulty in intercepting ballistic missiles is that they are very fast and supersonic cruise missiles would make up for the weakness of being generally slower.
The only guided munitions in WW2 I know of were naval torpedoes, I think everything else was still unguided.
Iran also gave Israel advance warning of this attack, and again only struck military targets. That's why no Israelis died.
Cost-wise, defence costs ~$1m -- 3.5m per launch. The attacks are costing Iran ~$80k per missile.
So that's a ~$15m attack which would cost ~$400m to defend against completely.
The Guardian discussed this: <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/oct/01/stopping-iran-...>.
Obviously I'm being facetious, but we're not talking about some crazy hi-tech gizmos or even genuinely ground-breaking technology, and that price does get a Tesla or two, so really $100,000 isn't cheap. Plus we are not discussing U.S. DoD contractor prices which "everyone knows" have no known correlation to reality.
No guidance. These are basically aerial mines and serve as area-denial weapons.
Of the many thousands of Qassam rockets launched, they've inflicted 23 deaths (22 Israeli citizens, one Thai national), per Wikipedia:
take it for what you will, but lists the cheapest iranian long range ballistic missile at $3mil (and no longer in production)
this seems to have similar data
https://www.trtworld.com/middle-east/neither-israel-nor-iran...
> "The (Iranian) drones are not costly, around $50,000 (and) $250,000 for each cruise missile and from $1 to 10 million for a ballistic missile, depending on the model," he says.
Combined with heavy use of slow drones (which can be tracked and hunted down), this permitted far more positioning and preparation of countermeasures.
Yesterday's defence was mobilised in hours to minutes. The ballistic flight time from Iran to Israel is twelve minutes.
It's almost like it's a country under constant missile attacks from all sides. And they spent money on shelters.
cant seem to find an archive link for this one
Initial archives are of pending attack. Later ones describe the attack after it had occurred.
I am curious. Why?
I looked him up. Is he not a scammer?
Wonder about the effect in the US and the election. I can see today's debate being about this.
What to Submit
On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.
Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic.
> would be a significant escalation that threatens to spark an all-out war in the Middle East that the Biden administration has desperately tried to avoid.
Did they, though? Because every single action the US has taken in the last ~year seems to have been leading to this exact outcome.
I am not sure what you are implying - the US parking warships nearby seems like a strong deterrent. It didn't work this time, but it didn't mean it's a bad idea.
You use deterrence to prevent a bigger conflict. It's on Israel and its leadership (Bibi) that they used the lull between their increasingly brazen attacks against their opponents as an excuse to launch a full scale invasion of a neighbouring country.
That's half of their top 6, actually.
You would have to do a very bad faith reading of the news over the last year to imply the current administration has been trying to increase tension between Iran and Israel.