Hacker News Reader

Comment by rtpg | Hacker News Reader

I've been messing with Uiua (https://www.uiua.org/) a good amount recently, and find its sort of dance between having a stack and being an array language somehow gets you to a nice level of legibility despite being a combo of two styles that tend to generate line noise.

View on HN

The front page there has examples like “÷3/+∿⊞×⊟×1.5.220×τ÷⟜⇡&asr” - is that closer to noise, or does it actually look more readable than K once you get used to both? I’m kind-of intrigued by the built-in multimedia output, but still this language looks scary and impractical at first glance. How does it compare to using numpy & jupyter? Do a lot of people prefer the extreme tenseness over using typeable keywords? I’m curious why it lets you type the readable operators but wants to turn them into glyphs; wouldn’t it be more approachable, more readable, and make more maintainable code, if it just used the keywords instead of glyphs?

Well firstly you can just type keywords and they get swapped by glyphs

Secondly, the power with Uiua is you can easily split up that expression literally by just hitting enter in some spots (and line swapping but…). You can give names

And finally if you are constantly doing operations across arrays it can be more legible to go a symbol like approach, like how most people prefer x+y to add x y. The conciseness helps you build up larger expressions before you need to break things up.

Cool language. I happened to notice the ⍜ operator, which operates on a transformed array, then reverts the transformation. Not sure if other array languages include this, but it's a really cool idea. I always found the traditional map/filter operators to be limiting in this regard, kind of like trying to write expressions without using parentheses.

It's in several, particularly newer APL dialects; see https://aplwiki.com/wiki/Under#History . Proud to say I originated the "structural" form used by Uiua, which is able to deal with transformations like filtering that lose parts of the input. Every language now seems to have its own take on what exactly Under means, with different implementations leading to different supported functions and various ways to relax the theory to be more convenient or handle intuitively expected things better.

Under is a concept in array languages, though it’s supported in a very adhoc way

Thanks for the link, it looks like a fascinating language

Reply on news.ycombinator.com