Hacker News Reader

>I call it weird nonfiction: creative work that presents itself as journalism or nonfiction but introduces fictional elements with the intention of upsetting, disturbing, or confusing the audience.

By this definition, Blair Witch Project seems to fit. Is that right? The examples given in the article seem to indicate a different intention or tone.

View on HN

This tripped me up too until point 3 in the piece:

> If you are wondering whether or not something counts as weird nonfiction, consider its weirdness. Modern mockumentaries do not work because there is no uncertainty; the documentary element is used to advance the plot, mug at the camera, key the viewer in.

I read this as: non-fiction elements in service of advancing the plot is a strike against.

Really, "weird nonfiction" is whatever the author wants it to be. The examples are a total grab bag IMHO.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com