This is about US policies. The US has a high dependence on cars so it makes sense that it is being singled out
This is about US policies. The US has a high dependence on cars so it makes sense that it is being singled out
Really, if you are isolating in your house, and loose power. What are you doing? A lot of people would need to go out and sit in the car with the AM radio to get any information.
I suppose to make it fair, every house should also be required to have an AM radio.
Maybe just to prevent digital lock in.
I'd hate to be in an Emergency, and suddenly I can't get any information because all I have are digital devices, An app on the phone, and the app was discontinued, or no longer supported.
So you probably want to enforce a check on having am radio and that it actually works because young folk won't notice it not working as they won't be using it. This means that the enforcement will likely fall at least partially on the car owner. I wonder how younger folk, who have less financially stability and are not as interested in the radios as the previous gen, will react to this potentially new requirement.
This being the US, I would expect the kind of people that argue against socialised healthcare to also argue against on the basis that each person should be capable of purchasing a $10 am radio receiver and keeping it with themselves, their emergency bag or their car for emergencies without needing the state to play nanny
Nothing about this is car specific except it makes for a good example, and people like to whine anytime cars are mentioned.