It's really funny that all the comments here about the "restrictive license" avoid admitting that license is Creative Commons, because open source has become such a caricature of its ideas that Creative Commons is the villain now.
Specifically, it violates freedom 3 of the FSF definition (redistribute changes), and section 3 of the OSI definition (Derived Works). This freedom is at the core of what FOSS is.
And that's before the violation of freedom 0, "The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose" of the non commercial licenses.
Makes me wonder what the general statistics are on individuals ignoring licensing entirely.
Time to go make the ultimate SPDX-License-Identifier with an OR clause between every single entry.