Spock sign-up flow demonstrates how to scare users away... (by Jeremy Zawodny)
jeremy.zawodny.com
jeremy.zawodny.com
If you've ever seen many eye tracking studies, you know that items in the location on the page aren't likely to be seen, leading the user to believe (right or wrong) that they either must disclose a password or go away.
Maybe you missed it because you wrote the story with a sensationalist conclusion in mind. At least you got to say 'fuck', right?
Implying that I missed because of how I'd written my take on it seems a little odd. You do realize that I wrote it after the fact, right?
Of course you do. But it's more fun to pretend that I don't "get it."
Had I wanted to be sensationalist, I could have done so.
Building a successful site is absolutely not about giving users everything they want, how they want it. That line of thinking can be very damaging to your site.
Some people crave a pure solution. For me, a web site that employs the trick above loses my trust, and I will never really feel comfortable in using it anymore.
How could he miss the "Skip this step" button so clearly pictured??
Regarding the sites getting my Gmail/Yahoo passwords, I don't think any site is really happy doing that. (We at Buxfer also do it, but it's tucked inside the site for users who really want to do it.) If Gmail and Yahoo were to open up even more and provide secure access to the addressbooks, nobody would have to do this stupid scraping anymore.
a) I don't want people to give away my email address anyway b) perhaps it would be possible to create a kind of bookmarklet or browser plugin that would make it easy for people to submit addresses from their address book? For example a "buxfer-invitation-bookmarklet", which people could use to send buxfer invitations to people from their address book?