Why is Apple so bad at marketing its TV shows?
fastcompany.com
fastcompany.com
I wonder how many people are burnt out on dramas that have 8-10 episode seasons, end on a cliff hanger, and you have to wait 1-2 years for the next season. At this point, I've just stopped watching any series that isn't "done" regardless of the streaming service.
That’s fine, it’s small but mostly high quality. How much TV do you want to watch?
I often open Netflix and just browse new additions. I can do this often, because I know the library will add new shows and movies every week.
Me, and definitely so many! But I am still a sucker for them, they produce really good shows and I'll watch them. I think part of the problem was the writers strike from 2023 there was a lot of momentum lost from that and I think a lot of reorganizing / reconfiguration as well. Hopefully 2025 will usher in some stability in the TV industry.
The cliffhanger is just a advertisement for the next season.
Also everyone just forgets all the nuances when a new season come out 1 year later. Typically, this is fine, but since these shows really rely on those nuances you end up getting disconnected from the show.
As opposed to something like Game Of Thrones, which was basically a single 70 hour movie split arbitrarily.
Shows that I loved and I was invested in got cancelled after two seasons, the ending was rushed because the producers got better gigs, later seasons got dumbed down and lost what made them special, constant pushing of political ideologies, lazy writing, cookie cutter dramas, same actors in every Spanish shows…
Yeah, when I seldom have the chance to watch something, I’m good with an episode of Monk, Friends or other classics I haven’t seen in two decades…
> Slow Horses has been almost impossibly well-received by critics and audiences. Now in season 4, I think this may actually be one of the overall-highest scored TV shows ever in terms of ones that have run this many seasons.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2024/09/06/i-am-beggi...
I believe it has been renewed for season 6.
I can remember not being enthused about the first two episodes of Our Flag Means Death, but loving the rest of the show, so you never know.
However, I do think they have been marketing their movies a lot better. One the new movies "Wolfs" with Brad Pitt, and George Clooney had billboards all over my city. I know many people that did watch that the first week it came out.
1: Do I need to buy another subscription?
2: Will I need to sit through ads?
If the answer is yes to either question, I'm not interested. I already have more TV that I want to watch than I can watch.
(I don't mind paying for shows outright, though.)
I don't want to have to manage subscriptions.
(source: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2024-07-21/apple-...)
What if Apple renamed Apple TV+ to just Apple Originals? The branding they are already using? Then we wouldn't have 3 different uses of "Apple TV" (the iPhone app, the streaming box, the subscription service)... and it's so much clearer to a customer what it means.
I personally wonder if a huge part of this, is just that customers have no clue what "Apple TV+" even... is. Does it have something to do with the Apple TV box being advertised when they bought their iPhone? And customers don't read, the title says all they need to know (or lack thereof).
Or another solution (for any employees reading): Spin it off the Apple brand. Don't use the name Apple on it. Come up with some stupid name along the lines of Pluto, Popcornflix, Freevee, or whatever have you; and offer an ad-supported free tier. Watch the viewership explode. Remove the ad tier afterwards.
Like what you saw? Want more? Subscribe.
I've never had this issue with Apple TV shows.
Netflix and Disney+ trained me to not even watch a show until it's concluded because it could get cancelled and I don't want to invest my small amount of free time on entertainment that might not even finish. It does produce a self-fulfilling prophecy where people with the same mindset as me on this do the same, and then the rating for something I (and probably they) are interested in aren't high enough and it gets cancelled.
What should worry them, though, is that it also led to the final step for them; I cancelled my Netflix and Disney+ subscriptions with no intention of renewing them around a year ago. The end result is that "TV series"-style shows are effectively dead to me; I've shifted my time on them mostly to novels (that are basically behind-the-curve on this trend, hopefully forever), followed by single-player video games, and finally movies. (Why didn't movies take the first slot? Because I'm only willing/able to give 30-60 minutes of continuous time to entertainment most of the time, and it's very unsatisfying to pause a movie to resume later.)
The continuous, immediate feedback on series performance coupled with a reputation of acting on that feedback immediately is killing the traditional television medium.
On top of all of that, Apple TV+ has the added albatross of requiring their hardware for the shows, as if they were somehow a siren song to get people more tightly nestled into their ecosystem, and therefore dooming their shows to failure, at least amongst people who don't want to pay for overpriced hardware running software of degrading quality over the years (I switched to Linux in 2016 because it was more reliable than my MacBook Air; being better than Windows isn't good enough anymore, especially when Linux has a greater catalog of software these days).
The needs of Apple, Inc weigh on their Apple TV division, they don't help it, and the sins of the streaming services against actually finishing a story further increase the trust deficit with Apple TV+. No amount of marketing is going to turn that around.
You do not need Apple hardware to watch Apple TV+ -- I'm watching it just fine on my LG TV with WebOS.
What are you talking about? You don't need an Apple device to watch their TV service. https://www.apple.com/by/apple-tv-app/devices/
If nothing else, they should be doing a full court press to get newspapers and ESPN etc to increase their coverage of MLS, even the Miami Herald is barely covering soccer and Miami is full of soccer fans and the team just set the all time single season points record and has one of the greatest athletes of all time on the field.
1. Marketing is primarily to get people to come to games as opposed to watching the team on TV. Problem is, nobody wants to go because the stadium is 45 minutes away without traffic.
2. Fans of other teams aren't going to skip their own team's games to watch Messi. They've been able to watch him in a world-class team for close to 20 years, so now that he's nearly 40 and walks around most of the time, they aren't as interested.
3. Miami is full of soccer fans that are fans of their favorite teams from their home countries.
4. Ticket prices are outrageous. So are parking passes. The new stadium isn't even breaking ground yet. Miami fans are used to getting screwed, and hosting Messi in this current mess is not helping.
5. ESPN will never advertise for a competitor unless they are forced to. ESPN lost the MLS rights to Apple TV+.
I will get roasted for this, but I enjoyed Foundation. Decent sci-fi with some cool visuals and interesting concepts. It just had nothing to do with the actual books.
Again, it's not the same as the books. And that's OK. It's hard to tell the same story with images in a small timeframe than it is to do over the course of a half dozen books each 500+ pages in length.
They attempt to cash in on the emotional value of these dramatic events without doing the legwork required to do it properly and so it falls flat upon its face.
Apple TV+, Apple Card, Apple News+, and Apple Arcade where all launched there. All have been, for Apple's size and scale, business debacles. Apple TV+'s debacles are well documented in this post, Apple Card is in the news today for incompetence (and has lost billions from Goldman Sachs, and has never launched outside the US), Apple News+ is doing okay with 19 million subscribers, and Apple Arcade has caused no shortage of public publisher ire (#1).
Edit for #1:
Apple Arcade has been a dumpster fire on the backend...
https://appleinsider.com/articles/24/07/31/apple-arcade-deve...
https://appleinsider.com/articles/20/10/08/ex-app-store-head...
https://mobilegamer.biz/inside-apple-arcade-axed-games-decli...
https://mobilegamer.biz/inside-apple-arcade-again-late-payme...
Apple Arcade from a user standpoint seems okay. (I have only played two games from it, but keep the subscription for other family members).
Apple TV I forget about, even though I have enjoyed some great content on it.
News, while I have it, I have never used. Same with Apple Music. (Which I think is in the same bundle of things).
I think if you're ok watching the content weekly and only watch an hour or two, if feels like there is content there, but if you binge like most people who stream do, there is hardly anything there. Most people would probably be better off to subscribe for a month or two a year and cancel the rest of the time.
Honestly, that seems to be part of the playbook for almost every show now. I wonder if people just didn't notice it much until the Bear or Ted Lasso, or maybe just because it's more of an abrupt departure from the main story line in those shows instead of just being a b-plot part of a normal episode.
When I look at the Apple TV+ catalog, I can see myself giving an honest shake to _most_ of their content. I simply can't say the same for other services. I understand why they are flooding the zone if they have the resources, but there's a finite amount of content one human can watch.
If Apple releases 50 shows and 80% are up my alley, I get the same amount of enjoyable content as Netflix releasing 400 shows but only 10% are worth my time.
Slow Horses
Lessons in Chemistry
Severance
Ted Lasso
Shrinking
Mythic Quest
Roar
CODA
The Problem with John Stewart
And we are looking forward to checking out, in no particular order: Palm Royale
For All Mankind
Criminal Record
Killers of the Flower Moon
Foundation
Strange Planet
The Morning Show
Greyhound
They're not all knockout hits. Overall we just feel safer trying something new there. If we don't like it, it's usually just because it's not for us, and less because it feels like an algorithmic, soulless cash grab.Hard disagree from a personal view. Also statistically, I don't think you can strongly claim this since many of their shows have lots of awards if you go off that metric. I haven't done the calculations but I would guess that their content to award ratio is even higher than many other networks.
That is probably true, but only because they have so little content overall. It is nice that it's not choke full of low budget reality nonsense and foreign stuff, but they also have basically none of the back catalog of content that other services have.
That's a good point. Plus it's not like I can't resubscribe later and catch up on everything again.
Really hard to agree with this. The shows I've enjoyed most recently are primarily on Apple. Slow Horses, Ted Lasso, Severance, Silo, Dark Matter, Foundation. And, unlike Netflix, Apple seems willing to bring back well regarded shows for a second season, instead of canceling for something new.
I don't use Apple equipment at all, it's unpopular here, but Apple TV subscription was the only thing from them I really though may be worth it.
Also shows on each platform are largely different depending on country, to the point where it's a pathetic fraction of what US has. It puts Apple TV in a bit better light.
There's so many good shows on Apple TV.
That isn't to say they don't, it's just a cultural attitude inside the company. It's a crying shame because their content teams have obviously great taste and are willing to experiment, and they must be pulling their hair out over this, but yeah – AAPL should not only do more and better marketing, but consider licensing their content out in a limited fashion to draw people in, especially if they're going to maintain 'the product markets itself' – I can still buy iPods in BEst Buy, for an example.
People WANT apple to succeed on this content front. The Apple Vision program especially would benefit from high quality content, well-marketed, especially to drive adoption and thus reduce cost; amazing immersive/interactive content is the killer app for AR/VR if you ask me.
Let silly Zuck make dumb avatars and fake lowbrow games, if I'm going to project content directly onto my eyeballs, let it be Oscar-worthy.
enabling ≠ tastemaking
1: AR puzzle game, looks fun but ultimately is only slightly better than an idle game on your phone.
2: VR board game, might be good but it clearly fails to take advantage of being VR.
3: Knock off Beat Saber.
4: AR pool table. I don't think I need to explain why this is lame.
5: Hard to tell what this is but it looks to be a flat game played in VR
6: Family Guy.
7: Various card games/basic board games in AR.
Which of these is a high brow, tastemaking VR/AR experience? Because the only things fitting that description I can think of are not playable on the AVP to the best of my knowledge.
Apple's development mandate[1] is explicit: 'elevated content across [x, y, z] genres.' aligned with their stated brand assets & perceptions with consumers.
They are good at maintaining their brand! But entertainment isn't Walled Garden Design™. Even Jobs knew to trust Lasseter to make stories and deferred to his wisdom on that front. Apple should start doing the same with the many fine creators eager to work with them and see their stories compete with NFLX or WBD.
The power of Apple's marketing in action.