> This is because you’re not being precise in your reasoning. Look at the specifics and make a decision based on the facts in front of you

I agree with the premise here, but in my experience running incidents review the issue that I see it’s a mixture of a performatic safetycism with reactivity.

Processes are the cheap bandaid to fix design, architectural and cultural issues.

Most of the net positive micro-reforms that we had after incident reviews were the ones that invested in safety nets, faster recoveries, and guardrailing than a new process and will tax everyone.