I would rather know what potentially harmful substances are in something and decide if it’s acceptable than not be told at all.
I would rather know what potentially harmful substances are in something and decide if it’s acceptable than not be told at all.
Indeed the level is so low that under the law, the daily recommended dose of vitamin A for pregnant women would need a notice saying it caused birth defects. They had to ignore the law and add a caveat for vitamin A since not taking it causes birth defects.
If they didn’t pick an arbitrary threshold, ignoring scientific consensus on what dose makes the poison, it would have been far more successful.
23 pages of small print single lined basic lines.
It includes everything from Aspirin, Aloe Vera leaf extract, Oral contraceptives and estrogens, Alcoholic beverages, Leather dust, Chinese style salted fish, to Benzene, Bracken Fern, and hexavalent chromium.
Bracken fern being particularly widespread, but surprisingly contains a highly potent cancer causing chemical that can also get passed to humans in cows milk. [https://aacrjournals.org/cancerpreventionresearch/article/3/...].
There is likely nowhere in the state that shouldn’t technically have a Prop 65 warning on it.
Thanks guys, real useful