I think this medium already proved that it doesn't work.
A new social media model needs to emerge - we shouldn't try to rebuild the same old with a fresh coat of paint.
The data architecture starts eith a personal cryptographic data store. Which can have endless different types of data in it. So for example you can have SmokeSignals Events in your feed or FrontPage reddit like in your feed. https://bsky.app/profile/smokesignal.events
And it's all open data. So we can analyze thr network & try to spot & root out large influence campaigns, find patterns of behavior that bad actors and sometimes state sponsored actors are pushing on the network.
There's so many open possibilities here. I can get how on the surface this looks "the same old with a fresh paint of cost," but the techies are moving here en masse because we believe this is so much more fertile a ground with so much more potential & possibility, we believe it will be a place we can put in energy & ongoingly iterate & improve social networking.
And the team has very explicitly designed the system to assume that someday BlueSky may become the problem. It's not fully tested at scale but we have the technical ability to walk away, & keep the social network going, if the BlueSky corporation ever loses our trust.
It's sad that there's such a fatalistic nihilistic air about, that judgements are so quick to be called. It's still early days for the AtProtocol/BlueSky, but we already see the protocols not platforms decisions here enabling experiences so far beyond what BlueSky corporation alone could ever hope to provide, and that ever-richening interconnection & potentiation is incredibly alluring & a chance unlike any we've seen in a generation.
It's a centralized service run by a company. It's not much different from (early) Twitter. In the end. See this discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42178543
Enjoying your link. Pfrazee is such a straight shooter. His post doesn't seem to support the idea that this is centralized. And the whole team keeps saying things like "the network should outlast the company"; everyone has been very vocal about that. https://bsky.app/profile/pfrazee.com/post/3lau2bgyolc2g
There's absolutely for sure social challenges with clickbait. I'd love to see labelers spring up which users can opt into to give some forewarning, which can label posts as clickbait or misleading or not-supported-bt-their-links, et cetera.
Bluesky already has great defenses against some of the worse forms of inflammatory discourse. If someone reskeets only to dog pile on you, you can remove your inner skeet from theirs. Your blocks can remove previous interactions you've had from your feeds. When people are coming in to flame you, there's a much more mature set of tools on Bluesky to handle it.
Are you aware that Bluesky is censoring posts algorithmically? X is full of people posting videos of themselves starting with a brand new account with zero followers, posting something the left doesn't like (e.g. "there are only two genders") and the account is instantly suspended.
It's unclear how this is compatible with the idea of user-driven decentralized networks or moderation. Maybe they'll implement that one day but by then it'll be too late. Everyone who might benefit from user-driven decentralized labelling will have simply given up and gone back to X years earlier.
People interested primarily in intentionally shitty inflammatoryness had taken over X. We are all so excited not to be surrounded by antagonistic bluecheck trolls being top-ranked & algorithmically boosted.
I have a hard time believing there's a problem here. This seems ideal. You could host your own PDS very easily if you still wanted to be part of this, and I expect it would then be up to moderation lists & labelers to handle this retrograde junk. The protocols exist & are available to all. Thankfully gratis hosting on Bluesky isn't unconditional too.