Computer Science is to Software Engineering as Physics is to Civil Engineering.
Software Engineering is to programming as Civil Engineering is to construction.
Software Engineering is to programming as Civil Engineering is to construction.
In construction, the random guy pulled in to swing a hammer may cut something wrong once or twice and waste a little time and money, but he's never going to be trusted to design the way the support beams hold up the whole house, so the damage is very limited. Software is not like that, we expect everyone to do some amount of design and engineering, whether or not they have any ability to do so. If as much software dev was driven by very low-level grunt work as is the case in construction, LLMs would already have revolutionized the field a lot more than they have; as it is, we've probably got another couple years to wait.
Software Engineers are usually quite capable programmers, while construction needs a lot more people _doing_ the construction than working as Civil Engineers, even if Civil Engineers wanted to join in.
That's not quite my point, though: we don't expect physicists to be good at Civil Engineering or construction, and we ought not expect Computer Scientists to be good at Software Engineering or programming. Having some understanding of physics makes a Civil Engineer better at their job, similarly for Computer Science and Software Engineering. And both construction and programming can be undertaken in isolation, but you're unlikely to be successful in your larger project unless you have Civil Engineering or Software Engineering expertise.