Who said net zero? Perfect is the enemy of good.
OP is expressing dismay at EVs and suggesting building bike lanes instead. (Not in addition to.) The latter doesn’t solve the problem the former is being built to address. More bikes is nice. More EVs are necessary.
Suggesting more bikes as an alternative to EVs isn’t perfect versus good, it’s fielding rubber ducks against battleships.
Interesting. I didn't read that at all, but now this conversation makes a little more sense.
But suggesting bike lanes, not positioned as an replacement to cars, is a great idea.