Hacker News Reader

Although, the sources in this case are basically articles citing things he said on Twitter.

Does that make them invalid? Surely we’re not expecting to see Dotcom’s dangerous misinformation published in a peer reviewed scientific journal?

I believe OPs point was that there is very little ambiguity when the source is his very own words posted by him directly

Are his words untrue or just disliked?

Dotcom's?

Dotcom's words are untrue, yes.