Unlike the PPC and x86 transitions? What was the rationale for such speculation?
Unlike the PPC and x86 transitions? What was the rationale for such speculation?
Yes.
> What was the rationale for such speculation?
IIRC, primarily they theorised that Apple would take the view that applications would be ported quickly enough there wouldn't be a need for one. I will try and dig some of them up but searching old videos and podcasts is painful.
Marco Arment: "if there is a compatibility layer, I wouldn't actually expect one, it'd be too slow and too crappy".... "anything related to x86 I think is not supported at all".
Casey Liss: (talking about a compatibility layer) "...I want it to be there, but I don't think it'll be there, especially since Apple seems to be on their high horse about how mighty and powerful they are these days"
Siracusa goes the other way - predicting that there will be a compatibility layer, mostly based on there being one the last two times. Then, incorrectly in my view, predicts it'll be worse than their previous attempts.
I'm sure I remember other commentators from around the time saying similar things, but I can't find them.