What restrained the US from spending ~$3T and causing ~1M deaths (combat forces, contractors, and civilians) in the Middle East? Would this capability materially change the appetite for conflict, based on historical actions? I don't believe "skin in the game" is a valid component in decisioning this technology implementation. We should want it to be, but it won’t be.
https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/papers/2023/IraqSyria20
https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/files/cow/imce/papers/20...
https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/costs/human
https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/projects/drone-war/