He should be more careful with his words, but they're resorting to cherry picked quotes and guilt by association to mislead:
"appeared onscreen next to"
It's unserious. To get his actual opinion, which is nuanced, you have to go long form.
"appeared onscreen next to"
It's unserious. To get his actual opinion, which is nuanced, you have to go long form.
It was something produced by his own non-profit. Do you not think it is fair to associate him with the non-profit he founded and ran? He has had no trouble associating himself with the organization. I feel like we can make the same association without misleading anyone.
This is still just a deflection from the question of what "people who aren't against vaccine technology" even means. Can you please define it? I am having trouble seeing the difference between being anti-vaccine and being anti-vaccine technology.
NOTE: The comment I originally responded to has since been edited.