Amazon secretly slowed deliveries, deceived anyone who complained, lawsuit says
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
You can't make this stuff up. Amazon is an oppressor that destroys communities. It is also an oppressor of people of color if it doesn't provide them enough Amazon services. Why not let them be free of the horrors of two-day shipping?
The problem was that Amazon used its own drivers for wealthier areas, but relied on the post office for poorer areas. They oppressed local communities by forcing them to use government services!
Amazon notes that they stopped sending their own drivers to certain neighborhoods because they are too dangerous.
This is what parasitic government looks like. Let crime be out of control. Have terrible services. A corporation comes along that nonetheless through a miracle of logistics bring goods to the doorstops of a community that government has failed in every way, sue it for not being fast enough relative to some other community without the same problems.
What a disgrace."
source: https://x.com/RichardHanania/status/1864375901103988792
At first it was an item or two and I didn't think much of it, but then even just the shipped notice wouldn't show up for several days for a prime item and I'd get the late notice way after it was late. The impression I got was that the website was going to say 2 day delivery regardless of the situation, but in reality it had no chance and they had no interest in telling me until after it should have arrived.
In the past year or two it has happened more and more to where I see 2 day delivery and I think "yeah maybe..."
that self-help alternative is always available and seems preferable to me (and the rest of the economy) than another vague "govt. protect me from my poor choices" law and resulting lawsuits/lawyers which is 100% guaranteed to solve exactly nothing wrt. getting packages delivered faster.
if they lie about this, intentionally or otherwise, and you still believe them, it isn't their fault. and it isn't something that a law can fix either.
i don't need need a consumer protection law to tell me to stop paying for services that aren't living up my expectations. regardless of what the vendor promised.
i was referring to the aphorism:
fool me once, shame on you
fool me twice, shame on me