Yeah, reliably stopping a heavy very fast spinning object in just a few degrees of rotation is necessarily violent.
They do it (basically) by predicting whether your hand will touch the blade, rather than waiting until it does touch the blade.
If you wait until someone actually touches the blade, then yes, you have to operate very very fast. That is unavoidable due to physics, as you say.
But if you can gain 100ms or 250ms by proving a 100% probability that the hand will touch the blade before the person can stop it, you now have a lot more time to stop the blade.
I can show you a video of an air quality meter sitting between the cameras and the saw hood if you want. The amount of particle change is minimal
This is company producing high end sliding table saws that cost tens of thousands. They've been at it for over half a century.
This is not someone producing a 299 saw as cheaply as possible.
They are a German company (ie regulated heavily) and have a ridiculous number of safety standard certifications that test things like "what happens when there is dust"
do you really think they haven’t thought of the obvious basic issues and figure out what to do about them?
if so, what evidence do you have that this is true?
(Also I think you don't understand European requirements on dust extraction and allowed exposure to wood dust. This saw does not produce a meaningful anount of dust)
I can't think of anything, short of dropping a person on the saw.
Because that's what doesn't happen and people lose fingers.
A hawk decided to throw a dead animal at the window behind me hard enough to shatter it. I was startled and my hand moved enough for my palm to cross the top of the blade.
I would not have lost fingers most likely but it would have been very bad.
To your point accidents are not always foreseeable. Yeah some people work stupidly but plenty of times, It’s just random unexpected events.