Hacker News Reader

Comment by PaulHoule | Hacker News Reader

scary... my experience is that the more platforms try to get this kind of thing right, the more they get it wrong.

back in the 90's, photoshop would try to do all sorts of gamma correction on images you were editing with the consequence that, if you didn't turn it off and make sure it was always turned off, you'd get your colors wrong 100% of the time.

a system like that working requires that all the pieces be correctly configured, and the consequence is that instead of having something that's 4.1 inches on one platform and 5.2 on another, you have something that's 12.7 inches on one platform and 1.4 on another.

View on HN

Gimp had the only cheap effective, backward compatible solution:

There was a setting that showed a ruler in the screen, you could scale it to match a ruler you were holding against the screen.

It disappeared after a while...

I don't think this would be necessary if folks ensured their X server's Screens' resolutions were configured correctly.

    $ xdpyinfo | grep -A 2 '^screen #'
    screen #0:
      dimensions:    1920x1080 pixels (483x272 millimeters)
      resolution:    101x101 dots per inch
    $

The all X clients would know how many pixels represented a physical measurement on the screen.

And how do you configure it? most lcd manufacturers put wrong info on labels and dmp info

One uses

    Option "DPI" "96 x 96"

in an xorg.conf or similar file; this overrides DDC from the monitor. Note, not all monitors have the same density of pixels in both directions. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Xorg#Display_Size_and_D... has more.

but my monitor does not have the real DPI the label on it's back says... configuring by DPI is moot.

i read a little more on the link you provided... and the closest to the gimp old way of doing that is putting the width and height of the viable area of the monitor in mm. think that might work rather well if it's correctly implemented.

I wasn't suggesting reading a label. One measures the visible picture in real life, e.g. ruler, and calculates the DPI. CRTs didn't have a label on the back and, anyway, one could adjust the picture size.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com