This website is the best argument against itself. Every single colour combination was awful, to the point it literally made my eyes hurt, and had so little contrast as to be useless.
I’ve seen better designed and clearer websites with two colours.
I’ve seen better designed and clearer websites with two colours.
My hypothesis is that the designers and developers are all using $3k MacBooks with the ultra high quality screens that can reproduce colors that humankind could never have imagined, while I’m using a ten year old piece of crap LCD monitor that seems to be staying alive simply to spite me.
Either that, or I’m getting old and my vision is starting to slowly fade.
So often I see variations of this rather than "How does it work?"
Defeating Anti-Intellectualism doesn't mean being antagonistic to non-native speakers. Intellectual != Asshole
Edit: Communicating in proper english is great till you're choking and you put your hands around your neck and pray the people around you understand your "sign language" so you don't die
You're being a grammar nazi.
Maybe you are built differently from myself, but as is the case with multiple people here, it causes mental whiplash to punctuate a statement like "How it works" with a question mark. I have to go back and parse it again and wonder what the question is and what I got wrong before realizing that it's just a grammatical error. When that happens, it wears on the limited attention I have to look at the thing you want me to look at.
Fix it, don't fix it, it's no skin off my nose. Lord knows every blog post or HN comment I've ever written is bedazzled with errors and typos. I haven't taken the trouble to fix it. I don't, however, pretend that so long as it's as or more intelligible than a Russian Numbers Station that it's "understandable enough".
Also, I invite you to call me a "pedant" or even a "general dumbass" before calling me a Nazi of any sort. Nothing I've (ever) written has warranted me being labelled as such, and I deeply resent it.
https://www.kveller.com/why-we-need-to-stop-using-the-term-g...
https://theotherpress.ca/dont-be-a-grammar-nazi-but-dont-use...
When you’re used to seeing things a certain way, and you come across something that feels wrong, it derails your line of thought, takes you out of the experience and requires additional willpower and processing to maintain focus.
I had to read it twice to realize the word order was wrong.
Dem lang be supreme fr
Auxiliary verbs (like "does") are not required to form questions in Russian, Spanish, Chinese, and probably many other languages.
* "Cómo funciona" -> "How it works", as in "tell me how it works".
* "¿Cómo funciona?" -> "How does it work?".
The auxiliary "do/does" really looks like an extra unnecessary word, but omitting it sounds wrong to a native speaker or anyone already more used to English.
Part of the confusion could be because sentences like "but she does write" and "but she writes" mean basically the same thing (they imply different emphasis, but you know what I mean). So if someone incorrectly does pattern-matching based on those examples, I can see them thinking that "how does it work?" and "how it works?" mean the same thing.
After all, the "-s" suffix kinda looks like an abbreviation of "does", the same way the "-'re" suffix is an abbreviation of "are" ("writes" vs "does write", "they're" vs "they are").
Instead of saying "Click here and I'll tell you how it works", you're saying "did you have a question about how it works? If so, click here and I'll tell you". I'd argue it's still valid English, but it feels uncertain and weak, like you're not quite sure that's the right question to answer.
How it works? - an unsure comment about it kind of works but unsure how/why is correct reason. i typically add additional ??? to help convey the unsure nature without using shrug emoji
How does it work? - interrogatory of wanting the answer
I'd never interpret it that it way. "It works(?)" or "It works?!?" I'd interpret that way, but "How it works?" to me is firmly questioning the statement itself, not how it works.
The author is not quite sure.
Why does it matter how you feel about language evolving(especially bringing race into it)?
Removing uppercase or dots might still convey the same meaning but making it harder to read.
It may not matter that much but it does matter.
It's not the principle to invoke when you're talking about simply making logical mistakes. A question mark is used at the end of a question, not a statement. "How it works" is a statement. "How does it work?" would be the way to word the same CTA as a question.
Details matter because they add up to an overall impression of the quality of your work. Think of it as the "Brown M&Ms" principle, if you're familiar with that story. (Google it if you're not, it's a great anecdote.)
Also, I can understand 3 police but I don't know how the 4th makes sense.
Holding them to a professional writing standard is a bit odd.
I think one problem is that human color perception isn't mathematically clean, we have (for instance) a bias toward perceiving colors differently on an anatomical level. And then you've got cultural connotations of colors, at different levels of granularity, right down to personal preferences. Insert shrug emoji here.
I can say I've never found one yet that I wouldn't trust without supervision.
My favorite is Huemint, it's very slick, but it's still not there.
https://www.theverge.com/22652920/android-12-how-to-pixel-st...
There isn't actually 4, but that 4th one you perceive...Notice ex. search doesn't do this, it's a stubborn Android engineering politics thing.
I can't even begin to explain how this happened, but, tl;dr: that 4th color was a huge problem to everyone involved. But, once it became a Big Thing, engineer middle managers...sigh. Not worth trying to explain. The amount of chicanery was really astonishing, odds are I'll never work at a BigCo again.
Now, they're stuck with it, even though VPs were insisting it to be fixed since day -100.
To all of your points , it sure looks like he's imitating the same logic to get that off-white...but then isn't using the important part: gotta use my/Google's color space.
That's the magic to get contrast without even having to see the colors or measure ratios or any of that BS. (tl;dr: HCT color space, it's CAM16 strapped to Lab* L, and then you can describe contrasting colors by a delta in tone / L)
The color combinations are sometimes pretty pleasant, e.g. check out valued like 30 or 70 or 335.
The page is missing a "contrast" slider, and also a "saturation" slider, to make the combinations more agreeable.
Also, dark highly saturated colors often look problematic unless they cover a large enough area; the --color-accent has this problem.