Too bad not disclosing that you always intended to convert the non-profit into a for-profit during your testimony while numerous senators congratulate you about your non-profit values isn't problematic.

https://www.techpolicy.press/transcript-senate-judiciary-sub...

Some might characterize OpenAI leadership as not 'consistently candid'.

Yes, which means his post is an attempt to smear the credibility of musk, not make a legal defense.

If this were a legal defense, this would be heard in court.

Its true. Also it looks like Musks original statement was correct that they should have gone with a C-corp instead of a NFP.

That should be top comment on all OpenAI threads.

Just like “open source and forever free” - until of course it starts to make sense charging money.

>For-profit isn't the problem

It was a problem around 2014 - 2022. Even the lying part isn't new. It has always been there. But somehow most were blind to it during the same period.

Something changed and I dont know what it is. But the pendulum is definitely swinging back.

Also, the missing message here is "we want to become for-profit"

yes but its easy to hate musk thinking u siding with the good guys...