This makes me wonder if our preference for group size might extend beyond conversation to other areas, like collaboration or even entertainment
2 people would do more direct pair programming of one doing more thinking / design / instructing and the other is the workhorse and supplemental designer. The third would be the polisher and tester, and participate in design as well when able to.
Idk if there is a role-based analogue in larger social groups but interesting to think about.
in the end it is like every classroom or presentation or group discussion. people are either engaged or they aren't. but breaking into smaller groups is not necessarily a problem in itself if everyone is still focused.