For some reason this has been downvoted, it seems some people on here think that whistleblowing is never about ego. I wouldn't be surprised if it was a factor most of the time.
So if the name is disclosed it‘s ego and if the source stays anonymous it’s not trustworthy.
Got it.
Didn't say that. Didn't say anything close to that. Not to mention you can be trustworthy and still do something for self-serving purposes.
Might makes right sycophants without own opinions or values are worthless company wherever you go..