be aware that the term 'terrorist' can be applied today to somebody that one day can win the Nobel prize for peace, and then become bad again.
It is a label
Sure, but it is an appropriate label for Russia today.
Destroying infrastructure isn't automatically terrorism. If Russia bombed people (or e.g. caved in a building where civilians could be expected to inhabit and thereby die in the collapse) then it would be terrorism. Cable bombing isn't terrorism, it's just sparkling warfare.
Russia also bombs people though.
> If Russia bombed people (or e.g. caved in a building where civilians could be expected to inhabit and thereby die in the collapse) then it would be terrorism. Cable bombing isn't terrorism, it's just sparkling warfare.
> If
You probably meant "when", friend.
If Russia bombed people (or e.g. caved in a building where civilians could be expected to inhabit and thereby die in the collapse) then it would be terrorism.