Hacker News Reader

Comment by kfarr | Hacker News Reader

There's an old essay "Meditations on Moloch" which is an exploration of themes around why humans create systems with destructive outcomes even when no individual wants them: https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/07/30/meditations-on-moloch/

View on HN

I still expect people to raise awareness if and when they're caught in a perverse incentive/Moloch situation so as to give the public greater insight into how it can be fixed.

Health insurers ... don't seem to do that.

Earlier comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42435020

This is a really good read. It talks about all kinds of systems which become their own entity. Nobody likes them. They make things worse for everybody. But somehow we get trapped in these downward spirals and there’s seemingly no way out.

Surely some people do actually want suffering, or at the very least are indifferent to causing suffering to advance their goals? I don't feel like there's some weird paradox, but rather that the system makes it too easy for sociopathic types to rise to the top.

I think this is related to fundamental attribution error. The system is messed up and therefore attracts messed up people in leadership positions, not the other around.

I guess I miscommunicated the thrust of my argument. It seems to me that the paradox presented in the linked article hinges on an assumption that "nobody wants" there to be suffering. This seems flawed to me. There are plenty of people - some of whom are in positions of great power - who are content to generate a large degree of suffering in order to advance personal goals. This is currently very clear in Ukraine and Gaza. But it applies equally well to people that drive shady mergers and acquisitions at the cost of the consumer, or people that push drugs at the cost of addicts' health and relationships.

It's not "nobody wants this", but "sufficiently many people are sufficiently apathetic to continue this state of affairs".

Reply on news.ycombinator.com