Hacker News Reader

Very interesting. Certainly good to know for the debate on AI stealing vs repurposing artists' content.

Which version of stable diffusion is this? I would think a newer, less overfit model would be much less likely to make these mistakes, especially given the random initialization nature of diffusion.

View on HN

I think this could hardly be a strong point, human artists can also reproduce verbatim art from other humans with reference or even from memory in some cases, the question would be more on the terms of "can it generate original art based on the reference ones most of the time?", which this kind of test don't prove or disprove.

And just to assert, I'm not saying AIs are like humans or nothing similar to that, this is more like playing devil's advocate.

These are from SD1.4, but someone in the replies was able to get the same results from SD1.5

https://x.com/stealcase/status/1874114960160379293

Reply on news.ycombinator.com