This seems the ideal balance as we each get what's valuable to us without overreaching (the original proposed terms would've covered literally everything including random stuff like books and video posts, which they didn't genuinely care about)
This seems the ideal balance as we each get what's valuable to us without overreaching (the original proposed terms would've covered literally everything including random stuff like books and video posts, which they didn't genuinely care about)
An NDA can also have some nasty obfuscated golden-handcuff clauses. =3
In one large company I won't name, the way we did it was to have someone with enough authority give me a statement in writing acknowledging that anything I made outside of business hours, using my own computing equipment wasn't owned by the company. That was good enough for me.
Nonsense. My wife negotiated modifications to her employment contract in her first job out of school. This included a diabolical adjustment to the non-compete clause that essentially made it worthless because it granted her the right to work so long as it was more than one mile away from one of the branch offices.
And since two of the branch offices were more than a mile from each other, that meant she could work anywhere, since any location, including in the same building as one of the branches, was at least a mile from a different branch.
It‘s not supposed to change any legal rules, but to document a usually silent agreement, if the employee wants that peace of mind. Obviously, nobody is under any obligation to show what they are doing in their private time, but especially when there can be a question if it is „too close“ to what the company is doing, it should be valuable to establish that line early and give the employee something tangible.