Hacker News Reader

Comment by normie3000 | Hacker News Reader

And for songs, often (fake?) testimonies to people's emotional attachments to the song.

moji moji moji who still bangin this in 2022? moji moji

The explanation I've heard for these is it's a low-effort bot comment that builds activity on the commenting account.

Whether that actually increases the value of an account or not, I'm not sure. But it's enough that spammers seem to think that having comments & replies on an account.

It may also be purchased comments to improve "engagement" metrics on videos for the creator.

My favorite ones are the comment threads for sentimental songs from the 80’s—you just get a flood of heartbreaking stories from older folks talking about their first loves, now passed on.

It's not just me / the music videos I look up then, is it? I can't help but wonder if it's some kind of YT hive mind, bots, or Google's own algorithms pushing those comments to the top.

Seems like they just put the comments with the most likes at the top... stands to reason that more likes = nicer comment.

I'm not sure. I would have assumed that this naive algorithm is what they had at first, and what gave us the cesspool?

I'm not convinced that the current trend of positivity is not caused by bots, but I wouldn't be surprised if the old system was just based on engagement. Meaning that upvotes and downvotes would both push the comment up. This is not intuitive, but would fit with what we've been seeing for the last decade or so.

Oh, some of the positivity is surely caused by bots.

And lots of the cesspool was not caused by bots.

First part of your comment is right, but your reasoning is wrong. A couple years ago, YouTube changed the visibility of negative comments, such that positive comments are prioritized (can’t like a comment if you don’t even see it).

This was also around the time they removed the thumbs up/down count.

This was to prevent creator burnout; imagine if every video you put out had some snarky diss against you in the comments.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com