His “extremely limited support” constitutes 41% of everyone under 30.
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5044269-poll-finds-41-...
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5044269-poll-finds-41-...
Seriously, ask a few asylum seekers from Honduras or El Salvador what they think about political violence. I guarantee you not a one will tell you about how romantic it all is.
Because political violence is obviously something to be scared of, not something to "revere". Like -- we can see it happen elsewhere. We can watch it on the tube every night.
It's not "edgy", Daria. Put down the hair dye and the kitchen sheers. You're too old to play act revolutionary.
Have you ever heard of these things?
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duel
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War
Seems like the victor in the later gets a lot of people to listen to them.
> It's not "edgy", Daria.
Clearly they should rely on the very mature practice of name calling instead.
Claiming someone has support is the ad populum falacy, you can argue that. But don't dismiss data because it doesn't support you.
I know old white guys who are the same way. The craziest thing is how "open-minded" they imagine themselves to be!
Why not ask some US citizens ? Or does assasination attempts at a running candidate does not count as political violence ? Or assasination of a president FWIW ?