You don't need the 16, you can get a much younger person to drive too. It only supports the fact that data amount/quality is not the problem.
I agree with that. I.e., for
"drive competently."
the way humans learn it is more general, i.e., also brings the list I gave with bycycles, pizza, grass mowing, etc.
Also
"drive competently."
the way humans do it requires a lot of judgment, maturity which is not very well defined!
Guys, I don't understand how to make progress on AI. E.g., just asked X > Grok "similitude", and it gave a good answer, maybe like a long dictionary answer. But it looked like Grok had some some impressive plagiarism -- I can't tell the difference.
The amount of knowledge/behavior that is innate - encoded in our DNA - is pretty minimal, consisting of things like opposite sex sexual attraction, fear of heights, fear of snakes, disgust at rotting smell, etc - basic survival stuff.
Its also not given or constant, modern humans are super young in the evolutionary scale and very different even if very similar from other animals. Funny enough we might have cracked the difference (language processing) but are still very far in the rest for AGI.