What if the LLMs are teaching us that long form prose/technical writing is just a really bad, unnatural format for communication but natural dialogues are a good format?
but the limitation in publishing a dialogue is that you'd just get to publish one of them and each reader is going to come in with different questions and goals for what they want out of the paper.
While you're still going to learn whether you go through the hassle of understanding the system, develop a method for debugging it and learning about it along the way...
Of course a senior could point you to the issue right away, probably an llm too, and even provide a learning opportunity, but does it hold the same lasting impact of being able to overcome the burden yourself?
Which one makes a more lasting effect on your abilities and skills?
Again, LLMs are a tool, but if people in school/college start using it to offload the reasoning part they are not developing it themselves.