Hydrogen is not a path to clean energy, it's a sideshow for an ostensibly-but-not-in-fact clean energy alternative by the oil and gas industry.
Hydrogen is not a path to clean energy, it's a sideshow for an ostensibly-but-not-in-fact clean energy alternative by the oil and gas industry.
But for some use cases like fertilizer and fuel for jet aviation and ocean going shipping it is the only realistic pathway we see today.
Now that renewables deliver cheap energy it is time to spend the big bucks to enabling the decarbonization of the use cases not solved by batteries.
https://mliebreich.substack.com/p/hydrogen-ladder-version-50
> Anything with a piston currently, plus a whole new slew of VTOLs and STOL aircraft, will go electric, so Light Aviation remains way down the ladder on Row F.
From all that I have heard from aviators as well as manufacturer side, electric crafts seem highly unlikely beyond small/unmanned vehicles or research prototypes. As much as I would love electric planes, I wonder what’s the veracity of his data (or expertise).
I agree for blue hydrogen, but for green I think that depends on what/how you use it. WE have two current problems that lend themselves to green hydrogen. The problem of de-carbonizing heavy transport and the problem of energy storage as more energy is coming from variable renewable sources. Creating green hydrogen at times of excess power generation, instead of load shedding or attempting large scale battery storage, and using it to fuel long haul trucking or trains would help solve both issues. Hydrogen powered vehicles don’t work for personal vehicles, since there is no infrastructure for convenient refilling, but the logistics of heavy transport already have central hubs where hydrogen stations could be installed.
I think in most definitions blue hydrogen that is produced from natural gas and carbon captured and stored, which is a bit iffy.
The hydrogen they are talking about in the article gets called white hydrogen - natural hydrogen found in the ground. It's probably a good thing if they can find lots.
"reuse much of their infrastructure"
Despite the rosy predictions of the gas companies, I doubt this is true in practice for most existing natural gas pipelines.
https://climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/can-we-use-pipelines-and-pow...
I used to do experiments with high-pressure hydrogen. It is a lot harder to get leak-free seals, and hydrogen is so small it can actually penetrate certain metals leading to embrittlement. The nice mercaptan we use so humans can sensitively detect leaks with their noses also won't be as effective any more (it's way too big.) I am not aware of a substitute.
Mass-scale deployment of hydrogen is just not going to happen.
We have increasingly longer periods of surplus electricity from solar and wind. So much so that getting rid of the surplus is a growing problem!
Splitting water to hydrogen using this surplus electricity would basically be "free energy" that can be stored for years. And when you consume it, the emissions are clean water!
Sunshine becomes free energy and clean water. What could possibly compete with that?
I believe the main problem is that it will disrupt the current revenue structures in the energy industry, which makes it hard to get the ball rolling. Anyone currently making money from selling electricity will lose if it gets cheaper, and hydrogen can only make it cheaper.
If we're using renewables to generate the hydrogen then I 100% agree. We probably won't be doing that though, and that certainly isn't what the Oil & Gas industry, the proponents behind hydrogen's push into the mass market, are trying to accomplish.
I'm not sure we're ever going to see cheap hydrogen.
Sounds like a good thing?
Whether it is actually possible and not just gaslighting like promises of plastics recycling, that's another question. Hydrogen has different properties, requires different materials and lower energy density than gas.
[1] https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in...
But that doesn't matter because if you wreck your economy and crater your GDP the economy becomes more green because you are doing less. /s