There were no similar reports in another place on this planet. (Since 99% of other places do not have full control of media and many have better healthcare so if it happened it would be less likely to go unnoticed)
> A joint study published by China and the World Health Organization at the end of March acknowledged there could have been sporadic human infections before the Wuhan outbreak.
> Researchers from Britain's University of Kent used methods from conservation science to estimate that SARS-CoV-2 first appeared from early October to mid-November 2019, according to a paper published in the PLOS Pathogens journal.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52975934.amp
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/08/health/satellite-pics-cor...
Covid detected in wastewater samples
December 2019 in Italy: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7428442/
>November 2019 in Brazil: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.26.20140731v...
They found covid in samples of the sewage system in SC state Brazil in November. 2 months before it came out of wuhan
https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/saude/novo-coronavirus-ja-estav...
>March 2019 in Spain: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.13.20129627v...
Brazil recorded its first COVID death April 15, 2019. Initially taken as a data entry error by some, data for 2019 is still published nearly six years after the fact.
https://transparencia.registrocivil.org.br/dados-covid-downl...
November Brazil could happen because December is when rumours already circulated in China and October is when it was out in Wuhan already per your link.
April Brazil I don't know what to tell you, no sources support the wild claim that it was NOT a data error.
> 2 months before it came out of wuhan
Source? I bet it came out earlier. It was circulating in Wuhan before the pandemic according to WHO. Just people in China who are more likely to get infected are less likely to travel abroad (social class/sanitary conditions/etc) but maybe one person brought it out.