Hacker News Reader

Comment by tucnak | Hacker News Reader

To somebody who's completely out of the loop, hears about Pebble for the first time—why is this big news? Are we going to see novel software written for defunct hardware, or is the hardware going to evolve now that the software is open?

View on HN

It's one of the original smart watches. What really sets it apart from modern ones is the e-ink display and dead simple interface (just a few buttons, no touchscreen). This simplicity means that it continues to do what it does well and doesn't really feel like it has aged badly. Certainly I would rather wear a pebble than a gen 1 Samsung watch or moto360.

It's a delightful bit of kit that was sadly abandoned by owner and it's nice that they are open-sourcing a dead product instead of just leaving it to rot like so many other electronics are.

The pebble did not have an e ink display, It was just a low power LCD.

There were many models of Pebble. The original definitely had epaper[0].

[0] https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/getpebble/pebble-e-pape...

It was an LCD[0] but you are right that they marketed it as "epaper". But it certainly was not people normally think of as epaper where there are colored capsules that can hold their image without power. The Pebble just had an LCD that looked visually similar to epaper.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble_(watch)#Hardware

I stand corrected, thanks.

People really like their Pebble watches, and this will help keep them alive into the future. In some future, we may see new hardware produced that could use some derivative of the resulting operating system.

I'm more of a mechanical-movement person myself, but I'm also fond of these little e-ink things; and indeed, they have come a long way. Maybe somebody makes a true e-ink pebble and designs it well, too.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com