Pretty good idea! Especially now that SOTA tokens and email lists are so cheap. I don't understand why the tone of the article is so negative.
Would it be that difficult for the LLM generated newsletter to disclose that it's a summary of information provided by humans?
Decades ago there were people who didn’t really read the paper but just scanned the headlines - this is just a modern way of enabling that.
Still, it’s devious to monetize the existence of other content this way.
A disclaimer like that would likely make many readers feel "less comfortable" I suppose!
When "AI-generated articles" are disclosed, it upsets people. For instance, see the experiment articles on TechCrunch, The Verge, or the similar websites (I don't remember exactly which one).