I would love that.
Problem is, it will probably not tell you the truth about it as Twitter has always had censorship one way or the other.
So it will tell you what twitter policy is allowing people to talk about and allowing grok to report.
Problem is, it will probably not tell you the truth about it as Twitter has always had censorship one way or the other.
So it will tell you what twitter policy is allowing people to talk about and allowing grok to report.
OTOH it’s a problem if you say “Person X is a rapist”. Then you might get sued for libel. You can’t make false statements to destroy someone’s reputation.
Censorship online on a social media platform is not subject to any freedom of speech laws. Freedom of speech only applies to the US Government not restricting your speech. The social media platform has the authority to regulate speech however they want to on their platform.
In the USA, you can absolutely be sued for this. The plaintiff is unlikely to win, and you could probably get the case dismissed if you convince a judge that's it's clearly an opinion, but you'd still have to pay a lawyer some fees.
People can sue you for anything.
The first amendment doesn't protect you from lawsuits. It protects you from the government putting you in jail for speech.
"No one can sue you for expressing your opinion online or IRL. "
This is something that people seem to expect to be able to do on social media. I think maybe that's part of the point that was being made. People don't want social networks that are concerned with stopping libelous remarks from going viral. In fact, it seems like people would love a social network that consists exclusively of libelous remarks.
The weird thing is that social networks seem to actually be willing to deliver this content.