Yes, and some parts are very good. He also said some parts are not very good in the same statement.
That does not translate to supporting the entire agenda.
That does not translate to supporting the entire agenda.
I don't think anyone in this thread has claimed that he supports the entire agenda.
> That does not translate to supporting the entire agenda.
You're moving the goalposts.
Project 2025 was misattributed to this, it's called "Flood the Zone".
Everything after that is just noise.