Hacker News Reader

Comment by JoshTriplett | Hacker News Reader

> Cloudflare absolutely is in a position to take down domains they're hosting on those IPs while keeping other domains sharing the same IP up.

They could. On the other hand, why should they? I would much rather see them fight this court order and make it stop across the board.

View on HN

Cloudflare's customers are distributing copyrighted material. That's basic copyright law, and the host and distributor can easily take it offline after a court request.

Your response assumes I want to see sites distributing copyrighted soccer games taken down, rather than cheered on.

The courts are unlikely to cheer on such websites, though. For better or worse, copyright law exists in Spain, and it will be enforced either with Cloudflare's co-operation (Cloudflare blocking infringing websites) or without (ISPs blocking Cloudflare IPs).

What I'm hoping for, here, is a case along the lines of "this court order has been used irresponsibly, with no regard for collateral damage, and has blocked sites such as GitHub, X, Y, and Z, which have nothing to do with the purpose of the court order; the court order should be rescinded".

According to another commenter here, the court order specifically stated that unrelated websites should not be blocked, so La Liga is potentially in breach of the court order, and could be on the hook for a lot of money in damages, should the injured parties decide to pursue it.

Bit of a strawman, yea? Copyrighted material is flung from one end of the Earth to the other from thousands of places and you want to single out a single entity? How's that 3rd grade education working for ya?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com