To be pedantic, no one is against weird research.
They're against taxing people to do weird research.
By their nature, taxes are compulsory, and the bar for compelled action is high.
They're against taxing people to do weird research.
By their nature, taxes are compulsory, and the bar for compelled action is high.
who is compelled to invest in the future? (e.g education, public works, etc)