Pong was (originally) built using transistor-transistor logic on a circuit board. AFAIK it did not involve any software at all.

Of course you're right, and I should have put quotes around "just". It would be amusing to calculate how long it would take to render the Google home page via Doom via TypeScript; I'd guess much longer than the age of the universe.

Off topic, but as an obsessive debugger and experimenter with ADHD and someone who hates telling people lies about what can and can't be done your motivation speaks to my soul. But my usual rabbit holes last just few hours up to few days. And even those that go far (that avoided all obstacles) end up right before implementing the last step, when it becomes obvious to me that this thing can be done. Congrats on the sheer stamina.

I might use lesson you provided in my future to actually achieve something. I just need to doubt the feasibility of even the last step.

> And if I'm just totally wrong on this, then you have your answer on why I never gave up on this project. I never once, ever, at any point, lost hope that it wouldn't work (HOW COULD IT?!).... right up until the very instant when I couldn't deny it anymore and it was on the screen in front of me.

Has this experience changed your way of thinking at all? It sounds like the thing people thought was possible actually was possible, and that Turing completeness really did mean what people thought it did.