A lot of people said this, why building this I had no idea of how these languages looked. Now that I know about them my project looks like a cheap imitation of them :(
All these should be equivalent:
+ a b + c d +
+ + + a b c d
a + b + c + d
a b c d + + +
x = a + b
= + x a b
x a b = +
+ x = a b
x = a b +
x a + b =>> A lot of people said this, why building this I had no idea of how these languages looked. Now that I know about them my project looks like a cheap imitation of them :(
> Don't be disappointed. That's cool! You've independently discovered something.
I completely agree with mkingston's comment. Whether or not this project resembles other programming languages is beside the point. What truly matters is the joy you had building it. As Alan Perlis wisely said, "I think that it's extraordinarily important that we in computer science keep fun in computing."
This is a fascinating project, and in that same spirit of playful exploration, I'd like to share a minimalist, esoteric postfix language for drawing on a canvas that I built some time back: <https://susam.net/fxyt.html>.
You can also look at this polyglot thread with 65 languages https://codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/102370/add-a-la...