Hacker News Reader

Unless it culture wide problematic nurture! Then silence and passing the ball back to nature!

Oh, and unrealistic, idealising nurture due to unwillingness to look at nature. That nurtures problems, we do not deal with rational, instead we accumulate problems and shift the blame, until the buildup throws society on the side.

Oh, and if invisible nature, we pretend to nurture, then blame the failings on the individual.

Yes, im fun at parties.

Also, we cant have the meta, as in we cant have a discussion on our inabilities, retardations and the handicaps they inflict and how that influences the options and realistic futures humanity can have. No, its startrek or bust- a gentle approach, with self-control enhanced by gadgetry and low risk be damned.

I don’t read anything in the article related to nurture vs nature. Can you explain why you mention it?

don't you think the rate of non-family births plays to the balance between acquired and inherited aspects of existence?

but the article has nothing to do with traits and never discussed anything related to acquired or inherited. the comment just seems unconnected to me.

Also the conclusion is that the rate of unrelated children is remarkably low not high.

If it's not the father's choice, it's like stating raped women should always raise the kid.