LLMs don't reason the way we do, but there are similarities at the cognitive pre-conscious level.

I made a challenge to various lawyers and the Stanford Codex (no one took the bait yet) to find critical mistakes in the "reasoning" of our Legal AI. One former attorney general told us that he likes how it balances the intent of the law. Sample output (scroll and click on stats and the donuts on the second slide):

Samples: https://labs.sunami.ai/feed

I built the AI using an inference-time=scaling approach that I evolved over a year's time, and it is based on Llama for now, but could be replace with any major foundational model.

Presentation: https://prezi.com/view/g2CZCqnn56NAKKbyO3P5/ 8-minute long video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rib4gU1HW8&t=233s

info sunami ai