Trump's Big Bet: Americans Will Tolerate Downturn to Restore Manufacturing
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
I doubt most people will tolerate a longer-term downturn in the hope that a bunch of manufacturing will materialize. And I doubt that companies will want to do that. They moved manufacturing overseas to cut costs and get around labour.
As for lower prices, I doubt that'll happen either.
1. Does he have the time. There's two options for solving the time problem. 1. He has to convince, probably Democrats that this is the right solution. One way to do this would be to get far enough down the path that undoing it seems crazy, either because undoing it is more expensive or undoing it is politically untenebale, but really he has to convince everyone, because he has to convince business that want to make the capitol investment they won't lose cash if trade barriers are lifted in 2-4 years. 2. He does become a dictator(which he would have to live long enough to see this plan to fruition), he goes really harsh on tariffs, and makes the obvious case. But this still may not even work, because he would have to convince businesses making the capitol investment he would live long enough and stay in power long enough for this to all happen. What would that take 10 years? Maybe 20?
2. This has to go basically against market demands which for the most part in the US is cheap cheap cheap. Look at fast food, the rise of fast fashion, are people really by and large bought into the idea "it's ok if things cost more, because it's better for America / People who work in manufacturing get paid more". American's by and large I think are not good at doing things "for the greater good" and we're not in a "do things for the greater good moment"
I’m not convinced there’s any real strategy here.
Typically, when you see MIUSA items now, they're high-quality, because it doesn't make sense to use expensive labor while cutting lots of corners on process and cheaping out on materials when your finished good will still be expensive, only a little cheaper than making something high-quality, due to labor costs. This holds for most other developed-world manufacturing, too, and is the biggest reason that "made in [name of developed country]" is one of the more reliable high-level signals of quality—simply because it's rarely a good business idea to manufacture poor products at developed-world labor prices.
We can't compete at the lower end of prices & quality without cutting US labor pay rates a whole bunch.
If, by comparison, i owned a bunch of slaves i would make sure they do profitable work but i would also make sure they have a bed and something to eat. There is nothing interesting about denying them this.
Many underestimate how thoughtless and careless people get if ends dont meet. If any thought makes you angry you will find ways not to.
It is fairly easy to switch to chinese salaries, can go even lower. Just make it so that life doesnt suck. A good life is also in the cards.
What are the goals for domestic manufacturing?
FRED series tagged "Manufacturing" https://fred.stlouisfed.org/tags/series?t=manufacturing
"Manufacturers' New Orders: Total Manufacturing (AMTMNO)" https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/AMTMNO
I can't state more emphatically how utterly stupid Trump's tariffs are.
(Even if he likes to imagine it's already his.)
Only an idiot would tolerate this bet for longer than a couple of lost pay periods. In other words, Trump is losing this bet, bigly.
https://www.reuters.com/data/tracking-trumps-economy-2025-01...